Takuto Ikuta <tikuta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> During fetch, everything_local() tries to mark common part by >> walking the refs the other side advertised upon the first contact, >> so it is correct that the number of checks is not reduced in a fetch >> that does not fetch many refs, but the number of remote-tracking refs >> you have has no effect, so I doubt such a rephrasing would make the >> description more understandable. "When fetching from a repository >> with large number of refs" is probably what you want to say, no? > > For refs existing in local repository, everything_local looks to be able to find > corresponding object from packed or loose objects. And if it exists, > I think, cost of lstat(2) is relatively smaller than other operations. > But for remote refs, everything_local fails to find it from packed > object (this check is fast) > and it tries to find loose object by using lstat(2), and this fails and slow. > My patch is to skip this lstat(2) to non-existing ref objects for repositories > having large number of remote refs. This still does not make sense to me, and I suspect that I am misreading you. In what sense are you using the word "repository" and "remote refs"? Imagine this situation. I have a local repository A, I fetch from a remote repository B but in my repository A, I do *not* use remote-tracking refs to remember what the last values of refs at repository B. Now when I try to fetch a single ref from B into A, many refs B advertises point at objects A has never heard about, and that triggers many lstat(2) that yields ENOENT that is slow. Your patch is to optimize this so that we learn these objects do not exist locally without running many lstat(2) to objects and helps repositories (like my repository A) when fetching from a repository with large number of refs (like the repository B). It does not matter how many "remote refs" receiving repository (e.g. my A) has, and it does not matter how many "remote refs" sending repository (e.g. my B) has---whether it is refs/remotes/origin/foo (i.e. "remote") or refs/heads/foo (i.e. "local"), a ref at B that points at an object that is missing at A will cause the same lstat(2) at A without your change. That is why I think "When fetching from a repository with large number of refs" is what you meant, not "fetching into a repository with large number of remote refs" nor "fetching from a repository with large number of remote refs". Thanks.
