On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:38:42PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > I installed 'cvs' and whatnot to run t94* and t96* tests, and sure > > enough, 5 tests in 2 test scripts fail with '-x' tracing and /bin/sh. > > I think I will be able to get around to send v2 during the weekend. > > Well, I wasn't able to get around to it, and in the meantime > 'sg/test-x' got merged into 'next'. So here are the updates for those > two test scripts. > > The commit message of the first patch is perhaps unnecessary long, but > it's mostly about explaining why the affected test was working > reasonably well despite the rather weird 'test_cmp this that >>out > 2>&1' thing. You know I would never complain about a long commit message. :) Both patches look OK to me. My only comment on the first one was "you should just use 'return'", but I see Eric beat me to it. I do think the postimage of the second one is a little less readable. That's not a big deal to me, but I'm pretty sure I would intentionally write it the "original" way if I found myself in a similar situation. Which makes me wonder whether we'll end up accidentally re-introducing these kinds of "-x" failures. But as I said before, I'm willing to wait and see. -Peff