Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binaries too.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Bryan Childs wrote:

> 1) Due to the nature of our project, with multiple architectures
> supported, we strive to provide a binary build of our software with
> every commit to the subversion repository.

Git has no problems with binaries. Actually, one could argue that it has 
less problems with binary files than with text files, since it only 
recently acquired the capability (disabled by default) to transcribe 
certain files into the CR/LF line ending some Windows programs still 
insist on.

As for checking in binaries, you even could set up a post-commit hook, 
which builds the binary, and checks it into a separate branch...

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux