On Fri, Mar 09 2018, Junio C. Hamano jotted: > Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I think following the boost lib makes most sense. Therefore, >> I would like to go with "istarts_with". OK with you? > > I don't care too deeply; if we took starts_with() from there, where > what we now want is defined as istarts_with(), then that sounds like > a good thing to do. I don't care either, but just a note that we had this exact discussion around this time last year when I added a starts_with_icase() [1][2] which eventually got dropped. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqpohao2hw.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ 2. https://public-inbox.org/git/20170326121654.22035-4-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/
