Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm pretty happy with this now. Like v1, this is about not touching > the giant base pack when doing background gc. This saves about 2/3 of > memory, which in turn should improve performance if you're under > memory pressure. Thanks. I've quickly scanned them and the overall idea looks quite sound. I'll comment on individual changes if needed. Will queue.