Re: [PATCH v3] run-command: add hint when a hook is ignored

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> True.  The user could tell the server operator to rename them or
>> remove them because they are not doing anything useful, but then
>> as long as everybody knows they are not doing anything, it is OK
>> to leave that sleeping dog lie, as they are not doing anything
>> harmful anyway.
>> 
>> That brings us one step further back to question if the hints are
>> useful in the first place, though ;-).
>
> Yes, that last paragraph definitely crossed my mind. Do we have an
> opinion on doing anything here? (E.g., declaring the hints not worth the
> trouble and reverting them versus just living with it)?

I am tempted to declare that the "hints" was not a good idea and
suggest reverting them.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux