Am 05.03.2018 um 20:48 schrieb Andreas Heiduk: > Am 05.03.2018 um 18:52 schrieb Eric Wong: >> Thanks both, I've queued 1/2 up with Eric S's edits at svn/authors-prog. >> I'm not yet convinced 2/2 is a good change, however. > > I'm not sure which direction your argument points to: Do you object to a > $PATH search at all? Or would you like to remove the legacy code too? > Or is the code/doc/... in bad shape? OK, I've mismatched your reply and the patch number. So my new questions are: Do you object to the feature as such? Or would you like to remove the legacy code too? Or is the code/doc/... in bad shape beyond what E.S. already mentioned? Right now my team performs a hefty "git filter-branch" after each "git svn fetch" followed by black magic to set the new object ids in the caches / rev-maps of git-svn. Official support for "no synthetic email" would be much easier.
