Re: Obsolete instruction in SubmittingPatches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 01.03.2018 0:54, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> Is this part of guidelines obsolete, or am I not understanding this
>>> correctly?
>> 
>> I am merely being nice (but only on "time-permitting" basis).
>
> Does that mean that the integration of a series is easier, when there is
> a re-send?

When I am not interested in a topic, or there are other reviewers
who are more qualified and are interested in the topic than I am,
the protocol to require the final "Here is a verbatim final resend,
the only difference from what was reviewed is the reviewed-by's from
the reviewers." will let me completely ignore the topic while it is
being discussed (as long as I trust the judgment of these reviewers).

Otherwise I'd need to keep track of the progress of the discussion
on each and every topic, which is often impossible.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux