Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > One of the design goals of protocol-v2 is to improve the semantics of > flush packets. Currently in protocol-v1, flush packets are used both to > indicate a break in a list of packet lines as well as an indication that > one side has finished speaking. This makes it particularly difficult > to implement proxies as a proxy would need to completely understand git > protocol instead of simply looking for a flush packet. Good ;-) Yes, this has been one of the largest gripe about the smart-http support code we have.