On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:17:09PM +0300, Оля Тележная wrote: > >> I tried to replace all die("...") with `return error("...")` and > >> finally exit(), but actual problem is that we print "error:..." > >> instead of "fatal:...", and it looks funny. > > > > If you do that, then format_ref_array_item() is still going to print > > things, even if it doesn't die(). But for "cat-file --batch", we usually > > do not print errors at all, but instead just say "... missing" (although > > it depends on the error; syntactic errors in the format string would > > still cause us to write to stderr). > > Not sure if you catch my idea. format_ref_array_item() will not print > anything, it will just return an error code. And if there was an error > - we will print it in show_ref_array_item() (or go back to cat-file > and print what we want). OK, I think I misunderstood. It seems like there are three possible strategies on the table: - low-level functions call error() and return -1, that gets passed up through mid-level functions like format_ref_array_item(), and then higher-level functions like show_ref_array_item() act on the error code and call die(). The user sees something like: error: unable to parse object 1234abcd fatal: unable to format object - low-level functions return a numeric error code, which is then formatted by higher-level functions like show_ref_array_item() to produce a specific message - low-level functions stuff an error code into a strbuf and return -1, and then higher-level functions like show_ref_array_item() will feed that message to die("%s", err.buf). I think the first one, besides changing the output, is going to produce error() messages even for cases where we're calling format_ref_array_item() directly, because error() writes its output immediately. The second is a pain in practice, because it doubles the work: you have to come up with a list of error codes, and then translate it them into strings. And there's no room to mention variable strings (like the name of the object). So I think the third is really the only viable option. -Peff