Re: [Problem] test_must_fail makes possibly questionable assumptions about exit_code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:07:18AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:

> > In the rest of git, die() makes a command exit with status 128.  The
> > trouble here is that our code in Perl is assuming the same meaning for
> > die() but using perl's die builtin instead.  That suggests a few
> > options:
> > 
> >  a) We could override the meaning of die() in Git.pm.  This feels
> >     ugly but if it works, it would be a very small patch.
> 
> Unlikely to work since I think we use eval {} to trap exceptions
> from die.
> 
> >  b) We could forbid use of die() and use some git_die() instead (but
> >     with a better name) for our own error handling.
> 
> Call sites may be dual-use: "die" can either be caught by an
> eval or used to show an error message to the user.
> 
> >  c) We could have a special different exit code convention for
> >     commands written in Perl.  And then change expectations whenever a
> >     command is rewritten in C.  As you might expect, I don't like this
> >     option.
> 
> I don't like it, either.
> 
> >  d) We could wrap each command in an eval {...} block to convert the
> >     result from die() to exit 128.
> 
> I prefer option d)

FWIW, I agree with all of that. You can do (d) without an enclosing eval
block by just hooking the __DIE__ handler, like:

$SIG{__DIE__} = sub {
  print STDERR "fatal: @_\n";
  exit 128;
};

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux