On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 05:19:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Another think that notes do not address are another operation we > usually do on bugs: merge (or duplicates). There is a think I hate in > bugzilla and love in debbugs, it's that duplicate bugs are closed in the > former, and merged in the latter. When two bugs are the same, their > history are often *both* valuable, and you really don't want to lose one > half, you want to merge them. And you also want the option to "unmerge" > them, but for that the better option is to have the ability to duplicate > a bug (aka debbugs cloning). I can't wait for visualising the history of bugreports in gitk, along with duplicates/forks and merges :) > Anyways it's just gossip, but maybe someone will have a brilliant > ideas, so I'm just throwing my thoughts into this mail :) /me wishes all gossip would be as productive as this one :) Best regards, -- Yann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
