On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:55:02PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Of the three solutions, I think the relative merits are something like > > this: > > ... > > 3. w-t-e (Lars's patch) > > I thought Lars's w-t-e was about keeping the in-repo contents in > UTF-8 and externalize in whatever encoding (e.g. UTF-16), so it > won't help the issue hosting folks want to deal with, i.e. showing > in-repo data that is stored in a strange binary-looking encoding in > a more reasonable encodign while diffing, no? I thought it solved that by the hosting folks never seeing the strange binary-looking data. They see only utf8, which diffs well. -Peff
