Re: StGIT: stgitformatversion vs. stgit.formatversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-06-02 21:16:41 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:

> What about using branch.*.stgit.formatversion to store the version,
> to be consistent with other stgit-specific per-branch settings ?

Good idea. But we should probably fall back to stgitformatversion (or
better, upgrade from it) to be nice to those running Catalin's master.

It happens a bit too often that we find problems with patches only
after Catalin has published them on "master". (At least that seems to
be the case with patches coming from me!) Maybe a "pu" branch
(maintained either by Catalin or someone else) would be a good way to
smoke them out before they're written in stone and distributed to lots
of people.

If the stgitformatversion patch had been on such a branch, we could
just have edited it and not have to worry about upgrading old configs
(aside from posting a mail on how to upgrade manually).

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux