On 02/23, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 02/20, Stefan Beller wrote: > >> Add a repository argument to allow sha1_file_name callers to be more > >> specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical > >> change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories > >> other than the_repository yet. > >> > >> As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a > >> repository other than the_repository at compile time. > >> > >> While at it, move the declaration to object-store.h, where it should > >> be easier to find. > > > > Seems like we may want to make a sha1-file.h or an oid-file.h or > > something like that at some point as that seems like a better place for > > the function than in the object-store.h file? > > It depends what our long term goal is. > Do we want header and source file name to match for each function? > Or do we want a coarser set of headers, such that we have a broad > object-store.h, but that is implemented in sha1_file.c, packfile.c > for the parts of the raw_objectstore and other .c files for the higher > levels of the object store? > > For now I'd just keep it in object-store.h as moving out just a couple > functions seems less consistent? Fair enough :) -- Brandon Williams
