(+cc: bmwill@, who is working on protocol v2) Hi, Dorian Taylor wrote: > On Feb 21, 2018, at 2:15 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Thanks, I agree the document is buggy. Do you want to submit a patch? > > Will this do? Thanks for writing it. Do you mind if we forge your sign-off? (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches item '(5) Certify your work' for details about what this means.) > Note I am not sure what the story is behind that `version 1` > element, whether it's supposed to go before or after the null packet > or if there should be another null packet or what. Perhaps somebody > more fluent with the smart protocol can advise. I believe the 'version 1' goes after the flush-packet. Thanks, Jonathan
