2018-02-15 8:49 GMT+03:00 Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 08:08:54AM +0000, Olga Telezhnaya wrote:
>
>> Delete all items related to split_on_whitespace from ref-filter
>> and add new function for handling the logic.
>> Now cat-file could invoke that function to implementing its logic.
>
> OK, this is a good direction. I think in a more compact series we'd
> avoid moving the split-on-whitespace bits over to ref-filter in the
> first place, and have two commits:
>
> - one early in the series adding is_atom_used()
>
> - one late in the series switching cat-file over to is_atom_used() as
> part of the conversion to ref-filter
>
>> diff --git a/builtin/cat-file.c b/builtin/cat-file.c
>> index 6db57e3533806..3a49b55a1cc2e 100644
>> --- a/builtin/cat-file.c
>> +++ b/builtin/cat-file.c
>> @@ -382,8 +382,7 @@ static int batch_objects(struct batch_options *opt)
>> {
>> struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
>> struct expand_data data;
>> - int save_warning;
>> - int retval = 0;
>> + int save_warning, is_rest, retval = 0;
>
> Try to avoid reformatting existing code that you're not otherwise
> touching, as it makes the diff noisier. Just adding "int is_rest" would
> make this easier to review.
>
> I also think the variable name should probably still be
> "split_on_whitespace". It's set based on whether we saw a "%(rest)"
> atom, but ultimately we'll use it to decide whether to split.
OK, I will fix that.
>
> -Peff
