Hi, On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Sergey Organov wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > The wording is poor either way, but you are also not a native speaker so > > we have to rely on, say, Eric to help us out here. > > Likely, but why didn't you keep original wording from --preserve-merges? > Do you feel it's somehow poor either? Yes, I felt it is poor, especially when --recreate-merges is present, that is indeed why I changed it. Ciao, Johannes