Re: [PATCH 00/26] Moving global state into the repository object (part 1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For now the ignore_env bit lives in the repository, as that helps
> when working with submodules, when reading its comments.
> Unfortunately 359efeffc1 (repository: introduce the repository
> object, 2017-06-22) did not reason about the existence of the ignore_env
> flag in its commit message.
>
>> So from that point of view, it may not matter where the "bit" lives,
>> among repository, object-store, or ref-store.
>
> It matters on the scale of confusing the developer?

What I meant is that from the point of view, having the bit in the
data (not on the invocation) is confusing no matter which data
structure holds it--they are equally bad.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux