On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6 February 2018 at 03:13, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:28:10PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote: >>> I learned SANITIZE=leak today! It not only catches this but also "dst". >>> >>> Jeff is there any ongoing effort to make the test suite pass with >>> SANITIZE=leak? My t2038 passed, so I went ahead with the full test >>> suite and saw so many failures. I did see in your original mails that >>> you focused on t0000 and t0001 only.. >> >> Yeah, I did those two scripts to try to prove to myself that the >> approach was good. But I haven't really pushed it any further. >> >> Martin Ågren (cc'd) did some follow-up work, but I think we still have a >> long way to go. > > Agreed. :-) Should we mark the test files that pass SANITIZE=leak and run as a sub testsuite? This way we can start growing it until it covers everything (unlikely) and make sure people don't break what's already passed. Of course I don't expect everybody to run this new make target with SANITIZE=leak. Travis can do that for us and hopefully have some way to tell git@vger about new breakages. -- Duy
