There are some commands that have to be skipped from rearranging by virtue
of not handling any commits.
However, the logic was not quite obvious: it skipped commands based on
their position in the enum todo_command.
Instead, let's make it explicit that we skip all commands that do not
handle any commit. With one exception: the `drop` command, because it,
well, drops the commit and is therefore not eligible to rearranging.
Note: this is a bit academic at the moment because the only time we call
`rearrange_squash()` is directly after generating the todo list, when we
have nothing but `pick` commands anyway.
However, the upcoming `merge` command *will* want to be handled by that
function, and it *can* handle commits.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
---
sequencer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 114db3b2775..764ad43388f 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -2890,7 +2890,7 @@ int rearrange_squash(void)
struct subject2item_entry *entry;
next[i] = tail[i] = -1;
- if (item->command >= TODO_EXEC) {
+ if (!item->commit || item->command == TODO_DROP) {
subjects[i] = NULL;
continue;
}
--
2.16.1.windows.1
