Re: [PATCH 5/8] rebase: introduce the --recreate-merges option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

[...]

> +--recreate-merges::
> +	Recreate merge commits instead of flattening the history by replaying
> +	merges. Merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to merge
> +	commits are not preserved.

I wonder why you guys still hold on replaying "merge-the-operation"
instead of replaying "merge-the-result"? The latter, the merge commit
itself, no matter how exactly it was created in the first place, is the
most valuable thing git keeps about the merge, and you silently drop it
entirely! OTOH, git keeps almost no information about
"merge-the-operation", so it's virtually impossible to reliably replay
the operation automatically, and yet you try to.

IMHO that was severe mistake in the original --preserve-merges, and you
bring with you to this new --recreate-merges... It's sad. Even more sad
as solution is already known for years:

    bc00341838a8faddcd101da9e746902994eef38a
    Author: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
    Date:   Sun Jun 16 15:50:42 2013 +0200
    
        rebase -p --first-parent: redo merge by cherry-picking first-parent change

and it works like a charm.

-- Sergey




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux