Re: [PATCH v7 19/31] merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> +       while (*--end_of_new == *--end_of_old &&
>>> +              end_of_old != old_path &&
>>> +              end_of_new != new_path)
>>> +               ; /* Do nothing; all in the while loop */
>>
>> We have to compare manually as we'd want to find
>> the first non-equal and there doesn't seem to be a good
>> library function for that.
>>
>> Assuming many repos are UTF8 (including in their paths),
>> how does this work with display characters longer than one char?
>> It should be fine as we cut at the slash?
>
> Oh, UTF-8.  Ugh.
> Can UTF-8 characters, other than '/', have a byte whose value matches
> (unsigned char)('/')?  If so, then I'll need to figure out how to do
> utf-8 character parsing.  Anyone have pointers?

Well, after digging around for a while, I found this claim on the
Wikipedia page for UTF-8:

  Since ASCII bytes do not occur when encoding non-ASCII code points
into UTF-8, UTF-8 is safe to use within most programming and document
languages that interpret certain ASCII characters in a special way,
such as "/" in filenames, "\" in escape sequences, and "%" in printf.

So, unless I'm reading something wrong here, I think that means this
code is just fine as it is.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux