Re: [PATCH 6/7] worktree remove: new command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This command allows to delete a worktree. Like 'move' you cannot
> remove the main worktree, or one with submodules inside [1].
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
> @@ -688,6 +689,132 @@ static int move_worktree(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
> +static void check_clean_worktree(struct worktree *wt,
> +                                const char *original_path)
> +{
> +       [...]
> +       validate_no_submodules(wt);

It's slightly strange seeing worktree validation in a function
checking whether the worktree is clean since submodule validation
isn't an issue of cleanliness. I'd have expected the caller to invoke
it instead:

    int remove_worktree(...) {
        ...
        if (!force) {
            validate_no_submodules(wt);
            check_clean_worktree(wt, av[0]);
        }
        ...
    }

On the other hand, I could imagine it being called here as appropriate
if submodule validation eventually also checks submodule cleanliness
as hinted by the commit message.

> +       argv_array_pushf(&child_env, "%s=%s/.git",
> +                        GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT, wt->path);
> +       argv_array_pushf(&child_env, "%s=%s",
> +                        GIT_WORK_TREE_ENVIRONMENT, wt->path);
> +       memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
> +       argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "status",
> +                        "--porcelain", "--ignore-submodules=none",
> +                        NULL);
> +       cp.env = child_env.argv;
> +       cp.git_cmd = 1;
> +       cp.dir = wt->path;
> +       cp.out = -1;
> +       ret = start_command(&cp);
> +       if (ret)
> +               die_errno(_("failed to run git-status on '%s'"),
> +                         original_path);

Minor: I think there was some effort recently to remove "git-foo"
style mentions from documentation and error messages. Perhaps this
could be "failed to run 'git status' on '%s'". Ditto below.

> +       ret = xread(cp.out, buf, sizeof(buf));
> +       if (ret)
> +               die(_("'%s' is dirty, use --force to delete it"),
> +                   original_path);
> +       close(cp.out);
> +       ret = finish_command(&cp);
> +       if (ret)
> +               die_errno(_("failed to run git-status on '%s', code %d"),
> +                         original_path, ret);
> +}
> +
> +static int delete_git_work_tree(struct worktree *wt)
> +{
> +       struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +
> +       strbuf_addstr(&sb, wt->path);
> +       if (remove_dir_recursively(&sb, 0)) {
> +               error_errno(_("failed to delete '%s'"), sb.buf);
> +               ret = -1;
> +       }
> +       strbuf_release(&sb);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}

Style nit: In the very similar delete_git_dir(), just below, there is
no blank line before 'return'.

> +
> +static int delete_git_dir(struct worktree *wt)
> +{
> +       struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +
> +       strbuf_addstr(&sb, git_common_path("worktrees/%s", wt->id));
> +       if (remove_dir_recursively(&sb, 0)) {
> +               error_errno(_("failed to delete '%s'"), sb.buf);
> +               ret = -1;
> +       }
> +       strbuf_release(&sb);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int remove_worktree(int ac, const char **av, const char *prefix)
> +{
> +       [...]
> +       if (reason) {
> +               if (*reason)
> +                       die(_("cannot remove a locked working tree, lock reason: %s"),
> +                           reason);
> +               die(_("cannot remove a locked working tree"));
> +       }
> +       if (validate_worktree(wt, &errmsg))
> +               die(_("validation failed, cannot remove working tree:\n%s"),
> +                   errmsg.buf);

Minor: Same concern as in 3/7 about the multi-line error message
making scripted handling of error message collection more difficult.

> +       strbuf_release(&errmsg);
> +
> +       if (!force)
> +               check_clean_worktree(wt, av[0]);
> +
> +       ret |= delete_git_work_tree(wt);
> +       /*
> +        * continue on even if ret is non-zero, there's no going back
> +        * from here.
> +        */
> +       ret |= delete_git_dir(wt);
> +
> +       free_worktrees(worktrees);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/t/t2028-worktree-move.sh b/t/t2028-worktree-move.sh
> @@ -90,4 +90,30 @@ test_expect_success 'move main worktree' '
> +test_expect_success 'remove locked worktree' '
> +       git worktree lock destination &&
> +       test_must_fail git worktree remove destination &&
> +       git worktree unlock destination
> +'

Perhaps place 'unlock' in test_when_finished()[1].

> +test_expect_success 'remove worktree with dirty tracked file' '
> +       echo dirty >>destination/init.t &&
> +       test_must_fail git worktree remove destination
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'remove worktree with untracked file' '
> +       git -C destination checkout init.t &&

Reversion of 'init.t' probably belongs in the preceding test which
modified it, wrapped in test_when_finished()[1].

> +       : >destination/untracked &&
> +       test_must_fail git worktree remove destination
> +'

[1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAPig+cSV9_6j6Nkptma3BewKW8QQcem7gwFCb42VBW4Xe0Vr2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux