Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] commit-graph: implement git-commit-graph --update-head

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> diff --git a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
> index da565624e3..d1a23bcdaf 100755
> --- a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
> +++ b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh


> @@ -107,6 +112,9 @@ test_expect_success 'setup bare repo' \
>  test_expect_success 'write graph in bare repo' \
>      'graphbare=$(git commit-graph --write) &&
>       test_path_is_file ${baredir}/graph-${graphbare}.graph &&
> +     test_path_is_file ${baredir}/graph-head &&

This test and the one preceeding it are wrong.

Note that 'git commit-graph --write' above is missing the
'--update-head' option, so there should be no graph-head file written,
yet this 'this test_path_is_file' doesn't fail the test.

The devil lies in the previous test 'setup bare repo', where this bare
repo is created by cloning from a local remote: a simple 'git clone
--bare full bare' hardlinks all files under .git/objects, including
all graph and graph-head files that exist in the remote repo.

The previous test should run 'git clone --bare --no-local full bare'
instead, and then this test would fail because of the missing
graph-head file, as it should.  Specifying '--update-head' will make
it work again.


> +     echo ${graphbare} >expect &&
> +     cmp -n 40 expect ${baredir}/graph-head &&
>       git commit-graph --read --graph-hash=${graphbare} >output &&
>       _graph_read_expect "18" "${baredir}" &&
>       cmp expect output'





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux