Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> "false". Therefore, "is_missing_required_utf_bom()" might be 
> lengthy but should fit.

Thanks, sounds understandable a lot better than the original ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux