"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This series wires up an alternate hash implementation, namely > BLAKE2b-160. The goal is to allow us to identify tests which rely on > the hash algorithm in use so that we can fix those tests. Yay. > Provoking discussion of which hash to pick for NewHash is explicitly > *not* a goal for this series. I'm only interested in the ability to > identify and fix tests. Double yay.
