Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Putting code in master is OK; we can always refactor it. But once we > add and document a user-facing config option like this, we have to > support it forever. So that's really the step I was wondering about: are > we sure this is what the user-facing config is going to look like? Yup, that is an important distinction. > But that's sort of my point. It appears to be working, but the > prior-version safety they think they have is not there. I think we're > better off erring on the side of caution here, and letting them know > forcefully that their config is bogus. > >> At the same time... there's extension.partialclone in pu and it does not >> have check on repo format. > > IMHO it should (and we should just do it by enforcing it for all > extensions automatically). Sounds good.
