Re: [PATCH 00/10] 'test_i18ngrep'-related fixes and improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 01:36:58PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:

> When 'test_i18ngrep' can't find the expected pattern, it exits
> completely silently; when its negated form does find the pattern that
> shouldn't be there, it prints the matching line(s) but otherwise exits
> without any error message.  This leaves the developer puzzled about
> what could have gone wrong.  Well, at least it left me puzzled...
> 
> Initially all I wanted to do was to make 'test_i18ngrep' more
> informative on failure, but then skeletons started to fall out of the
> closet^Wour test suite, and BAM! before I knew it I had 10 patches:

I know the feeling. :)

The series overall looks good to me. I left some comments on the
approach in the final few patches, but I could live with it as-is, or
with the approach Junio suggested.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux