[PATCH v3 02/11] fetch: stop accessing "remote" variable indirectly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Access the "remote" variable passed to the fetch_one() directly rather
than through the gtransport wrapper struct constructed in this
function for other purposes.

This makes the code more readable, as it's now obvious that the remote
struct doesn't somehow get munged by the prepare_transport() function
above, which takes the "remote" struct as an argument and constructs
the "gtransport" struct, containing among other things the "remote"
struct.

A subsequent change will copy this pattern to access a new
remote->prune-tags field, but without hte use of the gtransport
variable. It's useful once that change lands to see that the two
pieces of code behave exactly the same.

This pattern of accessing the container struct was added in
737c5a9cde ("fetch: make --prune configurable", 2013-07-13) when this
code was initially introduced.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/fetch.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c
index b34665db9e..a85c2002a9 100644
--- a/builtin/fetch.c
+++ b/builtin/fetch.c
@@ -1280,8 +1280,8 @@ static int fetch_one(struct remote *remote, int argc, const char **argv)
 
 	if (prune < 0) {
 		/* no command line request */
-		if (0 <= gtransport->remote->prune)
-			prune = gtransport->remote->prune;
+		if (0 <= remote->prune)
+			prune = remote->prune;
 		else if (0 <= fetch_prune_config)
 			prune = fetch_prune_config;
 		else
-- 
2.15.1.424.g9478a66081




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux