On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 02:32:17PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > All 'ci/*' scripts use 'set -e' to break the build job if a command > fails, except 'ci/run-linux32-build.sh' which relies on the && chain > to do the same. This inconsistency among the 'ci/*' scripts is asking > for trouble: I forgot about the && chain more than once while working > on this patch series. I think this actually fixes a bug: > # Update packages to the latest available versions > linux32 --32bit i386 sh -c ' > apt update >/dev/null && > apt install -y build-essential libcurl4-openssl-dev libssl-dev \ > libexpat-dev gettext python >/dev/null > -' && > +' If this step failed, then... > # If this script runs inside a docker container, then all commands are > # usually executed as root. Consequently, the host user might not be > # able to access the test output files. > # If a host user id is given, then create a user "ci" with the host user > # id to make everything accessible to the host user. > -HOST_UID=$1 && > -CI_USER=$USER && > -test -z $HOST_UID || (CI_USER="ci" && useradd -u $HOST_UID $CI_USER) && We'd have triggered the right-hand side of this "||", and run the rest of the script. The whole "||" block should have been inside {}. But after your patch, it should be fine with "set -e". Although... > +HOST_UID=$1 > +CI_USER=$USER > +test -z $HOST_UID || (CI_USER="ci" && useradd -u $HOST_UID $CI_USER) If this "useradd" step fails, we wouldn't abort the script, because it's part of a conditional. You'd need a manual "|| exit 1" at the end of this line. Or to use a real "if" block. Reading this line, I'm also slightly confused by setting CI_USER in the subshell, and then only using it once. Should it be respecting the outer CI_USER setting? If not, should it just hard-code "ci" on the useradd command-line? But that has nothing to do with your patch here. -Peff