On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:22:23AM +0300, Оля Тележная wrote: > >> In other words, I think the endgame is that expand_atom() isn't there at > >> all, and we're calling the equivalent of format_ref_item() for each > >> object (except that in a unified formatting world, it probably doesn't > >> have the word "ref" in it, since that's just one of the items a caller > >> might pass in). > > Agree! I want to merge current edits, then create format.h file and > make some renames, then finish migrating process to new format.h and > support all new meaningful tags. I think we have a little bit of chicken and egg there, though. I'm having trouble reviewing the current work, because it's hard to evaluate whether it's doing the right thing without seeing the end state. So what I was suggesting in my earlier mails was that we actually _not_ try to merge this series, but use its components and ideas to build a new series that does things in a bit different order. Some of the patches here would end up thrown out, and some would get cherry-picked into the new series. And some would have some conflicts and need to get parts rewritten to fit into the new order. -Peff
