[PATCH v2 09/18] cat-file: simplify expand_atom function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not sure, but looks like there is no need in that checking.
There is a checking before whether it is null and we die in such case.

Signed-off-by: Olga Telezhnaia <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx>
Mentored by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/cat-file.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/cat-file.c b/builtin/cat-file.c
index 9055fa3a8b0ae..dd43457c0ad7e 100644
--- a/builtin/cat-file.c
+++ b/builtin/cat-file.c
@@ -193,10 +193,9 @@ static void expand_atom(struct strbuf *sb, const char *atom, int len,
 		strbuf_addf(sb, "%lu", data->size);
 	else if (is_atom("objectsize:disk", atom, len))
 		strbuf_addf(sb, "%"PRIuMAX, (uintmax_t)data->disk_size);
-	else if (is_atom("rest", atom, len)) {
-		if (data->rest)
-			strbuf_addstr(sb, data->rest);
-	} else if (is_atom("deltabase", atom, len))
+	else if (is_atom("rest", atom, len))
+		strbuf_addstr(sb, data->rest);
+	else if (is_atom("deltabase", atom, len))
 		strbuf_addstr(sb, oid_to_hex(&data->delta_base_oid));
 	else
 		die("unknown format element: %.*s", len, atom);

--
https://github.com/git/git/pull/450



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux