Hi, On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I haven't come up with an addition to the test suite, but I suspect > > this change is conceptually wrong. What if a call to this function > > is made during a recursive, inner merge? Eek, good catch. > merge-recursive.c | 2 +- > t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c > index 780f81a8bd..0fc580d8ca 100644 > --- a/merge-recursive.c > +++ b/merge-recursive.c > @@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o, > if (oid_eq(&common->object.oid, &merge->object.oid)) { > struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT; > > - if (index_has_changes(&sb)) { > + if (!o->call_depth && index_has_changes(&sb)) { > err(o, _("Dirty index: cannot merge (dirty: %s)"), > sb.buf); > return 0; Yep, looks good to me; sorry for overlooking this. Elijah