Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Nice catch. I'll fix that in the next iteration. > > Is it OK if I send the next iteration soon or would you prefer > it if I wait until after 2.16 release? > > Plus, is it ok to keep the base of the series or would you prefer > it if I rebase it to the latest master (because of a minor conflict)? I do not see this topic as a fix for grave bug that needs to go to older maintenance track---it is rather a new feature, isn't it? So a rebased series that cleanly applies on top of 2.16 final would be a reasonable way to go forward. Thanks.
