Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c >> index 8104603a3..13ff00d81 100644 >> --- a/diff-lib.c >> +++ b/diff-lib.c >> @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ int run_diff_files(struct rev_info *revs, unsigned int option) >> >> diff_set_mnemonic_prefix(&revs->diffopt, "i/", "w/"); >> >> + if (!(option & DIFF_SKIP_FSMONITOR)) >> + refresh_fsmonitor(&the_index); >> + >> if (diff_unmerged_stage < 0) >> diff_unmerged_stage = 2; > > I read over this hunk five times, and only now am I able to wrap my head > around this: if we do *not* want to skip the fsmonitor data, we refresh > the fsmonitor data in the index. > > That feels a bit like an unneeded double negation. Speaking for myself, I > would prefore `DIFF_IGNORE_FSMONITOR` instead, it would feel less like a > double negation then. But I am not a native speaker, so I might be wrong. I do find the logic a bit convoluted with double negative.
