Re: [PATCH 4/4] clone: do not clean up directories we didn't create

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> Because we know that the only directory we'll write into is
> an empty one, we can handle this case by just passing the
> KEEP_TOPLEVEL flag to our recursive delete (if we could
> write into populated directories, we'd have to keep track of
> what we wrote and what we did not, which would be much
> harder).
>
> Note that we need to handle the work-tree and git-dir
> separately, though, as only one might exist (and the new
> tests in t5600 cover all cases).
>
> Reported-by: Stephan Janssen <sjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/t/t5600-clone-fail-cleanup.sh b/t/t5600-clone-fail-cleanup.sh
> @@ -42,13 +53,48 @@ test_expect_success 'successful clone must leave the directory' '
> +test_expect_success 'failed clone into empty leaves directory (separate, git)' '
> +       mkdir -p empty-git &&
> +       corrupt_repo &&
> +       test_must_fail git clone --separate-git-dir empty-git foo no-wt &&
> +       test_dir_is_empty empty-git &&
> +       test_path_is_missing no-wt
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'failed clone into empty leaves directory (separate, git)' '
> +       mkdir -p empty-wt &&
> +       corrupt_repo &&
> +       test_must_fail git clone --separate-git-dir no-git foo empty-wt &&
> +       test_path_is_missing no-git &&
> +       test_dir_is_empty empty-wt
> +'

The final two tests seem to have the same title...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux