Hi, On Sat, 26 May 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > >> In this, part of the pain is that Git tries to guess the version number > >> by itself in a complicated way. > > > > Yes, I never understood that myself why it has to be so complicated. But > > then, it did not make _my_ life hard, so I did not care. > > "echo "MyVersionNumber" >version && make"? Good to know! > > OTOH, it _is_ a nice thing to protohype the new commands as shell or perl > > scripts. When they stabilize enough, convert them to builtins. > > Protohype is a nice word. Throw out a half-working stuff and > advertise it as the best thing since sliced bread even before it > starts to being useful ;-) It started out as a typo. But then I liked it so much that I kept it ;-) > > With add--interactive, I think it's better to leave it [...] > > I do not follow you here. You mentioned several times that you were unsure if add--interactive was a good idea. But I like it very much. > > > But remote will soon be the center of my crosshairs. > > I am afraid that it might be a bit premature. > > I've been hoping that we can make git-clone a thin wrapper > around init/remote/fetch/checkout. For one thing, we would want > to split the separate-remotes layout and bareness to create > "mirror" (I called it "pure" previously, but this is really a > mirror) layout for git-clone, among other things, and that kind > of enhancements would need to be done inside git-remote. Fair enough. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
