Re: [PATCH 2/3] move index_has_changes() from builtin/am.c to merge.c for reuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> index_has_changes() is a function we want to reuse outside of just am,
>>> making it also available for merge-recursive and merge-ort.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> Note: These patches built on master, and merge cleanly with next and
>> pu.  However, this patch has a minor conflict with maint.  If you'd
>> prefer a version that applies on top of maint, let me know and I'll
>> resubmit.
>
> I think I managed to create two topics, one that is with these three
> patches (2/3 backported) on top of maint and the other one merges
> the former on top of master.  Please see if you found a mismerge
> when I push the results out.

I'm about to head out on a multi-day trip, so I might not get to this
until the middle of next week.  I'll try to take a look as soon as I
can, though.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux