On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Satyakiran Duggina <satya0521@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I see that `git init` creates a .git directory and hooks are to be > placed in that directory and these hooks are not tracked by version > control. To achieve tracked hooks, either each developer has to copy > the hooks or use tools like overcommit, pre-commit, husky etc. > > I'm wondering why hooks are not made external like .gitignore. I guess > it would be better to have two git configuration directories in a > repo, one hosting all the metadata managed by git and the other with > user configured data (hooks, ignore/exclude, repo config etc). Hooks are not external because they're not trusted. It essentially amounts to allowing someone to download an arbitrary script or program onto your computer which you then execute. It's extremely unsafe, and is intentionally not possible. To get hooks in your instance, you have to _manually_ install them. This gives you a chance to _review_ them before they start executing on your system. Any other approach and the hooks become an attack vector. > > Kindly let me know why the current design choice is made and if the > proposed change would introduce unseen issues. > > > Thanks, > Satya Hope this helps! Bryan Turner
