On 12/13, Igor Djordjevic wrote:
> Hi Reid,
>
> On 13/12/2017 18:32, Reid Price wrote:
> >
> > When running 'git stash push <subdir>' if there are both tracked and
> > untracked files in this subdirectory, the tracked files are stashed
> > but the untracked files are discarded.
>
> I can reproduce this as well (git version 2.15.1.windows.2).
>
> For what it`s worth, using `git stash save <subdir>` instead seems to
> (still) work as expected...
I think that depends on what you expect ;) 'git stash save <subdir>'
will create a stash of the whole working directory with the message
"<subdir>". So while it would indeed work for the presumably
simplified example Reid provided, it would not do what you'd expect if
there are any tracked and modified files outside of the <subdir>.
In that case 'git stash save <subdir>' would include the tracked files
outside of <subdir>, while what I assume Reid wanted is to keep them
in place, and only stash the files in <subdir>.
> but on the other hand, `git-stash`[1]
> manpage seems not to mention this usage ("save" with "pathspec")?
"stash save" with "pathspec" doesn't exist, and it will probably never
exist. We decided to introduce a new "push" verb for 'git stash'
because the command line for 'git stash save' takes a message as its
last argument, instead of taking the message with a -m flag like other
commands do. Introducing a pathspec argument for "git stash save"
would have either broken backward compatibility, or it would have had
some syntax that's very inconsistent with other git commands.
> Regards, Buga
>
> [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-stash
