Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Hi Junio, > > Could you please add (or squash) this on top of the 'ab/sha1dc-build' > branch, so that I can build with NO_DC_SHA1_SUBMODULE=NoThanks in my > config.mak. Makes sense. The patch looks scary by appearing to move the includes far to the front of the Makefile, but it in fact is moving the NO_DC_SHA1_SUBMODULE block slightly down and it is a sensible and safe move. I actually think that the block can go even further down, perhaps close to the run of choices "what variant are we building?" we make at around we have "ifdef NO_CURL". Ævar? > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 929b49b04..91bbb0ed8 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1042,6 +1042,10 @@ EXTLIBS = > > GIT_USER_AGENT = git/$(GIT_VERSION) > > +include config.mak.uname > +-include config.mak.autogen > +-include config.mak > + > ifndef NO_DC_SHA1_SUBMODULE > ifndef DC_SHA1_EXTERNAL > ifneq ($(wildcard sha1collisiondetection/lib/sha1.h),sha1collisiondetection/lib/sha1.h) > @@ -1053,10 +1057,6 @@ whatever reason define NO_DC_SHA1_SUBMODULE=NoThanks) > endif > endif > > -include config.mak.uname > --include config.mak.autogen > --include config.mak > - > ifdef DEVELOPER > CFLAGS += $(DEVELOPER_CFLAGS) > endif
