Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] sequencer: don't fork git commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/12/17 23:44, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I've reworked the config handling since v4. It now stores the default
>> values in struct replay_opt rather than using global variables and
>> calls git_diff_basic_config(). Unfortunately I've not had time to
>> modify git_gpg_config() to indicate if it successfully handled the key
>> so git_diff_basic_config() is called unnecessarily in that case. Within
>> git_diff_basic_config() userdiff_config() also suffers from the same
>> problem of not indicating if it has handled the key.
> 
> Ouch.  I thought we agreed that we were ready to go incremental and
> the topic was merged to 'next' earlier last week.

Sorry, I thought we were waiting, not to worry.
> 
> After scanning the difference between the two rounds, it seems that
> the more important difference is the rework of the configuration,
> which looks better thought out than the previous round, and with
> associated change to use replay_opts fields instead of free variables
> to carry gpg-sign and cleanup-mode settings around, which also looks
> sensible to me.

Yes the configuration is the major change, I'm glad you think it is an
improvement

> Can you make these differences into incremental "that earlier one
> was suboptimal for this and that reasons, let's make it better by
> doing this" patches to queue them on top?

Will do, though if I don't get round to it today or tomorrow it may be
the New Year before I send them, I hope that's OK

Best Wishes

Phillip

> Thanks.
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux