Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> If you were doing an efficient cgi script that renders history >> of git managed projects, binding git as its subproject, and that >> system can be built with either 'maint' (i.e. 1.5.2 series) or >> 'master' (i.e. ultrastable WIP towards 1.5.3), even though they >> both might come from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/, >> I think they should be registered as two separate logical >> subprojects. > > I agree strongly with this, and it's another good reason that we have > to be able to use something other than the URL as the key to look up a > subproject's repository location. If you use the URL it is impossible > to differentiate the two subprojects in this case. Heh, you do not have to rub it in ;-) I already agreed that your three-level arrangement is easier to work with. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
