On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:31:03PM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
> I think the list tends to prefer subproject over submodule.
Does it? It seems that everyone writing code is use submodule
instead of subproject. Either way, I don't really care.
> > @@ -193,9 +220,8 @@ int checkout_entry(struct cache_entry *ce, const struct checkout *state, char *t
> > */
> > unlink(path);
> > if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
> > - /* If it is a gitlink, leave it alone! */
> > if (S_ISGITLINK(ntohl(ce->ce_mode)))
> > - return 0;
> > + return checkout_submodule(ce, path, state);
> > if (!state->force)
> > return error("%s is a directory", path);
> > remove_subtree(path);
>
> I think the call to checkout_submodule should be moved to write_entry,
> to keep it in line with the other mode types.
Well, like your patch, this only deals with cases where the submodule
is already available. In write_entry you could potentially clone
submodules based on some criteria, but I'm not doing this just yet
since some people apparently prefer to get these things in pieces.
Also, it seems that some people would like this to be a step
that is separated from git-checkout (see Lars' patch).
skimo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
