Re: t9001 failures on 32-bit Linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/12/17 20:33, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Ramsay Jones
> <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I noticed the revert of the 'ab/simplify-perl-makefile' branch on
>> top of 'pu'. So, I fired up my 32-bit Linux and attempted to see
>> if I could debug this t9001 test failure.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I could not get it to fail. :(
>>
>> Both of the 'pu' (@77e921d77d) and 'pu~1' (@cfef1ebefd) builds pass
>> the full test-suite and, likewise, running t9001 in a loop for a
>> count of 100 (about 45 minutes run-time each).
>>
>> [If it makes any difference, I don't have sendmail installed (no
>> /usr/sbin/sendmail or /usr/lib/sendmail), or any sendmail in my
>> $PATH.]
>>
>> Sorry I couldn't help with this! :(
> 
> It's a bug in my patch, I'll follow-up with a patch once I figure out
> what it is, but for now I wanted to say it's my bad.
> 
> That this is failing has nothing to do with 32bit per say, but that
> system doesn't have Error.pm installed, so we fall back on our own
> copy, there's some bug in the new Error.pm fallback logic I
> introduced.

Ah, OK, that makes sense.

Thanks!

ATB,
Ramsay Jones





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux