RE: [PATCH] doc: reword gitworflows for neutrality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>As a native English speaker, I find the new phrasing odd, and think
>this may a step backward. How about trying a different approach? For
>example:

    >Occasionally, the maintainer may get merge conflicts when trying
    >to pull changes from downstream. In this case, it may make sense
    >to ask downstream to do the merge and resolve the conflicts
    >instead (since, presumably, downstream will know better how to
    >resolve them).

Indeed, this is an other possibility.

Thanks for the review.

Daniel BENSOUSSAN-BOHM



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux