On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> @@ -413,6 +414,7 @@ int cmd_version(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) >>>> >>>> if (build_options) { >>>> printf("sizeof-long: %d\n", (int)sizeof(long)); >>>> + printf("machine: %s\n", build_platform); >>> >>> Can this use GIT_BUILD_PLATFORM directly instead of going via the indirection >>> of a mutable static string? That is, something like >>> >>> printf("machine: %s\n", GIT_BUILD_PLATFORM); >> >> Good point. And if this is externally identified as "machine", >> probably the macro should also use the same word, not "platform". >> We can go either way, as long as we are consistent, though. > > In Autoconf parlance, this would be called "host architecture" (GIT_HOST_ARCH). My bad: "host cpu", rather (GIT_HOST_CPU).