Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I'm not sure how I feel about this. I see your point that there's no >> real value in maintaining two systems indefinitely. At the same time, I >> wonder how much value the submodule strategy is actually bringing us. >> >> IOW, are we agreed that the path forward is to get everybody using the >> submodule? > ... > In no particular order: > > * I don't feel strongly about 2-4/4 in this series. I just hacked this > up because it occurred to me that I'd left this sha1dc stuff in some > in-between state and we'd talked about eventually moving forward with > this. Good. > We've had two releases with the submodule being purely optional, if > we're going to keep it it seems logical to start at least using it by > default. With a need for a patch like 1/4, I suspect two release cycles is way too short for making a move like 2-4/4, though.
