Junio C Hamano writes: > Well the thing is that I cannot queue this and Dan's at the same > time, while both of these topics are expected to be in flux. For > today's pushout, I tentatively kicked out Dan's relative path series > and queued this one to see how well it works with the rest of the > system, after giving this patch another round of reading. > > It seemed that Dan was happy with (an earlier draft of?) this > build procedure simplification patch, so hopefully we can solidify > this one reasonably quickly and ask the relative path series to be > rebuilt on top of it? Sounds good to me! I'm in no rush, and if this is moving forward I'm more than happy to wait for it to land and rebase on top. I didn't want to weigh in too heavily on the actual details of this patch since I think the majority stakeholders are the folks who maintain the Perl subsystem and those who build distribution packages. My work on Perl only touches installation as a means to an end, and avarab@'s work does simplify this for me. Cheers, and thanks! -Dan
